June 16th, 2008 11:23 am


June 17th, 2008 1:31 pm

That weapon would actually be mediocre as a primary weapon in a zombie attack.
The eye-gougin’ spike would do little, because it does not look long enough to do significant harm to the brain if stabbed in the eye.
The skull-cleavin’ blade is also a poor feature, because it would take too much time and energy to remove the blade from the head.
The same applies for the bone-crushin’ mallet; too much energy required to use. Even though breaking a zombie’s legs would slow them down, that is all it would do.
It would also require you to get too close to the target before you could make a kill.
This weapon is really only marginally better than a plain club or an axe. It’s only saving graces are it’s e-z clean finish and comfortable grip.
Nowhere near worth 250 bucks!!! You’re better off going with a plain high quality katana sword.

But don’t take my word for it! Read Max Brooks’ “Zombie Survival Guide” for more.
Also, is it just me, or does the guy in the picture look like Mr. Buzzcut from Beavis and Butthead?

June 17th, 2008 4:24 pm

It’s a shame how people pray on those of us with an irrational fear of zombies. : )

I swear Max Brooks stole all his material right from my head. There is no way he could have been that close otherwise…

But I bet HE doesn’t have a sawed off shotgun with the words “ZOMBIE REPELLENT” engraved into it. Some of us are just “more” prepared then others.

June 17th, 2008 10:32 pm

Are they cheaper by the dozen?

June 19th, 2008 12:47 pm

I, for one, embrace our new zombie overlords and wish them many braaaaiiiins….

June 20th, 2008 7:21 pm

I want one!

July 25th, 2008 12:32 pm

Just in time for the holidays

October 18th, 2008 3:23 pm

I know this thread is as dead as it gets, but I watched the film ‘Fido’ last night. Heh, zombie film as social commentary, there you go. Highly recommend.
AND — Carrie-Anne Moss in a vintage 1950’s housedress…. OMG OMG OMG!